I need to put my 2 cents in.
Far be it from me to say I understand what someone is
thinking but here’s my take on Todd Akin’s blunder.
First of all, in saying “legitimate rape” he used a wrong
word. I believe he is of the old school of
people who believe that real rape is
the act done by force against the wishes of an innocent female. In his moral and ethical world view, he may believe to some degree the woman brought it on herself…..”she
came on to the fellow,” “she was dressed seductively,” “she shouldn’t have been
drinking,” “It wouldn’t have been a date rape if she hadn’t….”, “she shouldn’t
frequent those kinds of places..,” ad infinitum. He wouldn't be the first person to believe this.
I think the brouhaha about “Legitimate Rape” is, in this
nasty political climate, merely a way of getting political mileage out of a
glaring mistake. The man used the wrong word, but in doing so he exposed his own
world-view of women. His thinking goes
at least as far back as the cave-men mentality. We’re not there any more.
The people of Missouri should decide if they want to re-elect a
man who is that out-of-touch with the 21st century and who still is
living with a value system that says rape is understandable in some cases
because the woman probably brought it on herself.
Second, I would like to see someone ask Mr. Akin just
which doctors he has been talking to and why he feels it necessary to bolster
his case by citing them. I don’t think
those doctors exist. And if they do, I
hope they were seriously misunderstood by Mr. Akin and are brave enough to tell
the public just what it is that our female bodies are really supposed to do
after a rape.
I am appalled at Mr. Akin’s thought process and his set of
values. I hope he doesn’t try to claim
that they are old-time Christian and/or American values, because they are not.
I am appalled at the political folk who try to build a case
out of his misuse of an incorrect word; they are missing the point. The point is not “legitimate or illegitimate.” It is that there is no justification for rape
of any type and Akin just hasn’t learned that yet.
This silly argument, appalling as it is, is making our election system
go cuckoo. This election is NOT about
Todd Akin’s value system.
Attention: Please take
national politics out of this issue
and let this awful slip be dealt with in Missouri, where one would hope there
are enough enlightened Missourians to tell this man by ballot that he
can no longer represent them. And let our two
Presidential contenders get back to discussions of how we’re going to fix
things that affect all of us.
And Mr. Akin, please come into the 21st century
and rethink your position on the value of women.
2 comments:
Well said.
I have been wondering if someone somewhere was ever going to get away from the political capital to be made of this idiot's remarks and condemn rape. Rape is rape, a woman saying no means that she doesn't want sex, even if she is wearing a short skirt.
Post a Comment