Many people are totally flummoxed when they hear someone
saying, “He’s my first cousin twice removed” or worse yet, “She’s my second
cousin three times removed.” You can see
it in their eyes – “Removed to where?”
Today’s blog is going to clarify that for you, just in case
you consider yourself among those flummoxed.
The simplest answer is the word “removed” really has to do with
generations. Let’s say you have a cousin
Polly and Polly has a child. That child
is NOT your second cousin, although many people erroneously think so. That child is your first cousin once
removed. It just means one
generation separated from you.
I’ll give you an illustration and you can work it out with
your own relatives. Doing so helps clarify
things.
My grandma Jessie (first generation) had 7 kids.
My mom, Virginia, was one of them, and my cousin Shirlee’s
mom, Marie, was another.
Shirlee and I are cousins. Both of us have children.
These children are second cousins to each other, but to
Shirlee and me, they are First Cousins ONCE REMOVED.
When the children of cousins have kids, those kids are
related to each other as third cousins, but to us, they are still first cousins
but are twice removed (again, two generations from us). And so it goes.
Being as July is a month of celebrating national historical
events, I’m going to share with you some little tidbits of history that my
ancestors lived through or were involved in.
The first starts off with Agnes Hall’s family history paper. Agnes Hall was my Second Cousin once
removed. (Can you figure that out now?)
Agnes lived from 1881 to 1957 and was born in Kansas. Her family history in Kansas goes back to
Lawrence before it became a city and Kansas before it became a state. Her family came west from Virginia by flatboat
on the Ohio River. Her grandparents, Henry and Nancy Matney Corel, were
married in Virginia, built a house near the Kaw River in Douglas County, Kansas
and died there in a measles epidemic in 1855.
Agnes’ mom was Jemima Corel and she was a teenager then, the oldest of 5
children who were left orphans. These 5
little kids were raised by the myriad of Corel aunts and uncles who had all come
together to the west. Agnes heard all
the family stories and wanted to save them for her own children. In 1929 she wrote the following: Now Jemima Morris, your ancestor, was born in England and came to America very early. This same Jemima saw George Washington and said the Indians could not shoot him.”
In my genealogical research, I have not yet tracked down
Jemima Morris, so I don’t know how much of that is true. But I wondered what was meant by her saying
the Indians couldn’t shoot George Washington.
In my research I discovered this understanding came out
of the French and Indian War (1750-1763) when Washington served under General
Braddock. At one point Braddock wanted
to march into the wilderness, and Washington, who was an experienced
frontiersman told him this was not a good idea.
Braddock rallied the troops and went anyway. Washington survived but Braddock and hundreds
more did not. There are many books about
this incident, and in one I found the sentence “Later testimony indicated that
the Indians thought Washington was bullet-proof, since they had attempted to
shoot him many times….”
I would like to find and read that testimony. I would like to find Jemima Morris. I have been doing genealogy since 1984 and I
have found pretty much all the easy stuff.
I doubt if I have time left in my life to get answers for these….but
whatever, it is nice to know that in my family’s past, there were people who at
least claimed they saw George Washington.
I have never seen a president, so Jemima was one up on me!
1 comment:
Well I was definitely among the flummoxed so thanks for that clarification.
Post a Comment